AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Sarah day o connor4/12/2023 ![]() ![]() The ruling included a four-justice plurality, authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, as well as two separate concurring opinions Supreme Court Limits Government Ability to Interfere with Parents' Child-Rearing Decisions Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a Reagan appointee, wrote that state endorsement of religion, "sends a message to non-adherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community." Donnelly, in which she observed that state endorsement of religion "sends a message to non-adherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community."ĪCLU Urges High Court to Reject Texas School's "One Vote, One Prayer" Policy at Football Games Justice O'Connor's words echo her opinion in Lynch v. "When the government associates one set of religious beliefs with the state and identifies nonadherents as outsiders," Justice O'Connor wrote, "it encroaches upon the individual's decision about whether and how to worship?Allowing government to be a potential mouthpiece for competing religious ideas risks the sort of division that might easily spill over into suppression of rival beliefs." Some of the strongest language came from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's concurrence with the 5-4 majority, in which she said: "Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?" ACLU of Kentucky (2005) upheld the principle of government neutrality towards religion and ruled unconstitutional Ten Commandments displays in several courthouses. Carhart(2000) overturned a state abortion ban, legal analysis Federal Election CommissionPDF (2003) upheld most of the landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, including its ban on political parties' use of unlimited soft money contributions. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee PDF (2001) upheld laws that limit political party expenditures that are coordinated with a candidate and seek to evade campaign contribution limits. Republican Party of VirginiaPDF (1996) said key anti-discrimination provisions of the Voting Rights Act apply to political conventions that choose party candidates.įederal Election Commission v. Legal Foundation of Washington (2003) maintained a key source of funding for legal assistance for the poor. Weisman (1992) continued the tradition of government neutrality toward religion, finding that government-sponsored prayer is unacceptable at graduations and other public school events.īrown v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001) affirmed that civil rights laws apply to associations regulating interscholastic sports. ![]() Davis (2001) told the government it could not indefinitely detain an immigrant who was under final order of removal even if no other country would accept that person.īrentwood Academy v. Winn (2004) subjected discriminatory and unconstitutional state tax laws to review by the federal judiciary. Lane (2004) upheld the constitutionality of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and required that courtrooms be physically accessible to the disabled. Cromartie (2001) affirmed the right of state legislators to take race into account to secure minority voting rights in redistricting. ![]() Casey (1992) broke with Chief Justice Rehnquist and other opponents of a woman's right to choose as part of a 5-4 majority in affirming Roe v. Moran (2002) upheld state laws giving people the right to a second doctor's opinion if their HMOs tried to deny them treatment. EPA (2004) said the Environmental Protection Agency could step in and take action to reduce air pollution under the Clean Air Act when a state conservation agency fails to act. Bollinger(2003) affirmed the right of state colleges and universities to use affirmative action in their admissions policies to increase educational opportunities for minorities and promote racial diversity on campus.Īlaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. If she is replaced by someone who doesn't share her fair and impartial perspective, these are among the key 5-4 decisions in danger of being overturned: Sandra Day O'Connor has been the deciding vote in many important Supreme Court decisions affecting civil rights, environmental protection, personal privacy, voting rights, protection against discrimination and more. O'Connor Replacement Could Roll Back Vital Civil Liberties Protections > ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |